[Enforcement library](/enforcement)

# Baker v. Seattle Children’s Hospital

The court held that the public-webpage interactions before it were not communications between two or more individuals under the Washington Privacy Act. It did not decide claims about direct messages to a care team.

Washington Supreme Court · Washington Privacy Act, RCW 9.73

- Case record
- What this record establishes
- Checks for your own systems
- Sources and limits

## Case record

| Fact | Record |
| --- | --- |
| Authority or court | Washington Supreme Court |
| Law or issue | Washington Privacy Act, RCW 9.73 |
| Case number | 104590-5 |
| Procedural record | State high-court opinion issued |
| Opinion or order | 8 October 2026 |
| Source reviewed | 16 October 2026 |

[Court opinion or order](https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/1045905.pdf)

## What this record establishes

This page describes the cited opinion or order. A dismissal, pleading decision, standing ruling or jurisdiction decision has a different scope from a merits judgment. Later proceedings and appeals may change the position. Unpublished and nonprecedential decisions are identified in the status where applicable.

## Checks for your own systems

Inth’s technical interpretation: use this case to choose what evidence to collect in your own implementation. These checks are not instructions issued by the court or regulator.

- Inspect URLs, referrers, search terms, form values and account identifiers in outgoing payloads.
- Check health, financial and authenticated surfaces separately from public pages.
- Compare browser traffic with server relays, vendor logs and the purposes described to users.
- Map every session-replay and chat vendor, including embedded frames and server relays.
- Compare what the site receives with what each vendor can receive, read, retain and use independently.

> **Limits of technical evidence**
> A browser capture can show a transfer. It cannot establish every server operation, the terms of a contract or whether a law applies. Compare observed behaviour with the relevant disclosures and legal assessment.

## Sources and limits

[Court opinion or order](https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/1045905.pdf)

Source review: 16 October 2026. This record covers the cited source and procedural stage. It does not audit the organisation’s present implementation or establish every later legal development.

[Browse the enforcement library](/enforcement)