[Enforcement library](/enforcement)

# Byars v. Bio Clarity

The tentative ruling would reject enforcement of a browsewrap arbitration clause. It examines whether the website gave sufficient notice and obtained assent.

Los Angeles Superior Court · Arbitration and website terms

- Case record
- What this record establishes
- Checks for your own systems
- Sources and limits

## Case record

| Fact | Record |
| --- | --- |
| Authority or court | Los Angeles Superior Court |
| Law or issue | Arbitration and website terms |
| Case number | 24STCV01349 |
| Procedural record | Tentative: Motion to compel arbitration denied |
| Tentative ruling | 5 February 2025 |
| Source reviewed | 16 October 2026 |

[Court tentative ruling (mirror)](https://rulings.law/rulings/judge-theresa-m-traber/24stcv01349-2025-02-05.html)

## What this record establishes

The source is a court’s tentative text mirrored by rulings.law. This record does not establish whether the court adopted or changed it at the hearing, and does not establish the current docket status. A tentative pleading decision evaluates allegations; it is not a finding that tracking occurred or that a party broke the law. This trial-court text is not binding appellate precedent.

## Checks for your own systems

Inth’s technical interpretation: use this case to choose what evidence to collect in your own implementation. These checks are not instructions issued by the court or regulator.

- Keep the exact notice, screen sequence and version the user saw.
- Match each claimed consent to the particular collection, purpose and recipient.
- Check how notice and assent work on mobile, during sign-up and in embedded flows.

> **Limits of technical evidence**
> A browser capture can show a transfer. It cannot establish every server operation, the terms of a contract or whether a law applies. Compare observed behaviour with the relevant disclosures and legal assessment.

## Sources and limits

[Court tentative ruling (mirror)](https://rulings.law/rulings/judge-theresa-m-traber/24stcv01349-2025-02-05.html)

Source review: 16 October 2026. This record covers the cited source and procedural stage. It does not audit the organisation’s present implementation or establish every later legal development.

[Browse the enforcement library](/enforcement)