[Enforcement library](/enforcement)

# Huff v. Wilson Sporting Goods

The tentative ruling would sustain the tracking demurrer with leave to amend. It distinguishes the pleaded collection mechanism from general allegations about trackers.

Los Angeles Superior Court · CIPA

- Case record
- What this record establishes
- Checks for your own systems
- Sources and limits

## Case record

| Fact | Record |
| --- | --- |
| Authority or court | Los Angeles Superior Court |
| Law or issue | CIPA |
| Case number | 24STCV13922 |
| Procedural record | Tentative: Demurrer sustained with leave to amend |
| Tentative ruling | 17 December 2024 |
| Source reviewed | 16 October 2026 |

[Court tentative ruling (mirror)](https://rulings.law/rulings/judge-upinder-s-kalra/24stcv13922-2024-12-17.html)

## What this record establishes

The source is a court’s tentative text mirrored by rulings.law. This record does not establish whether the court adopted or changed it at the hearing, and does not establish the current docket status. A tentative pleading decision evaluates allegations; it is not a finding that tracking occurred or that a party broke the law. This trial-court text is not binding appellate precedent.

## Checks for your own systems

Inth’s technical interpretation: use this case to choose what evidence to collect in your own implementation. These checks are not instructions issued by the court or regulator.

- Record the IP addresses, device attributes and identifiers actually transmitted to each destination.
- Distinguish routing metadata, fingerprinting inputs and message contents in the evidence.
- Repeat captures before a choice, after refusal and after navigation.

> **Limits of technical evidence**
> A browser capture can show a transfer. It cannot establish every server operation, the terms of a contract or whether a law applies. Compare observed behaviour with the relevant disclosures and legal assessment.

## Sources and limits

[Court tentative ruling (mirror)](https://rulings.law/rulings/judge-upinder-s-kalra/24stcv13922-2024-12-17.html)

Source review: 16 October 2026. This record covers the cited source and procedural stage. It does not audit the organisation’s present implementation or establish every later legal development.

[Browse the enforcement library](/enforcement)