Skip to main content
Free
For developers evaluating or shipping internal tools.
$0/ mo
- 1 project
- 5,000 sessions & consent saves /mo
- All paid features on dev instances
- Production with usage billing
- Community + docs support
Inth vs Enzuzo
Enzuzo runs consent as a hosted script alongside policy generators and data-request tools. Inth Consent runs it inside your application through c15t, with the records hosted for you. Which one fits depends on what your team wants to own.
Ask your coding agent
Audit this codebase for Enzuzo and estimate a move to Inth Consent, built on c15t. Find the Enzuzo setup and any Consent Mode and tag manager wiring, list every analytics, advertising and chat tag, then report what c15t would replace, which consent category each tag needs, and what the page would stop loading before consent. Use https://c15t.com/docs/comparison and https://c15t.com/docs/integrations/overview.Privacy settings
Choose which cookies and tracking technologies this site may use.
Strictly necessaryRequired for the site to work.
AnalyticsHelps us understand how the site is used.
MarketingPersonalises ads and measures campaigns.
Reject allAccept all
Save settingsYour privacy choices
Choose how this site uses cookies. You can accept, reject, or customise optional analytics and marketing.
Reject allAccept all
CustomiseTrusted by
- Expo
- Zed
- Infisical
- Unkey
- Chelsea Piers
- Mario Testino
- Roboto Studio
- Cal.com
- Mastra
Which platform fits your team?
Tick the needs that matter to your team and see which platform meets more of them.
What matters to your team?
Inth Consent
Built for teams that own consent in their application.
7of 8 needs· Closer fit
Enzuzo
Built for consent alongside policies and data requests.
5of 8 needs
Consent state in your React and Next.js code
Inth Consent, Fits: Inth Consent · c15t packages expose consent state to your components and your server
Enzuzo, Not the focus: Enzuzo · Shared script, dashboard, consent API and Tag Manager options
Banner on screen in under 100 ms
Inth Consent, Fits: Inth Consent · 89 ms to a visible banner on the CookieBench c15t Next.js example
Enzuzo, Not the focus: Enzuzo · 285 ms on the CookieBench Enzuzo example
Hosted consent records
Inth Consent, Fits: Inth Consent · Every saved choice, region and policy version in your Inth dashboard
Enzuzo, Fits: Enzuzo · Timestamped consent logs and an audit trail
Script, iframe and network blocking
Inth Consent, Fits: Inth Consent · Script loader, iframe blocker and network blocker tied to consent categories
Enzuzo, Fits: Enzuzo · Scanning, categorisation and script blocking
Google Consent Mode v2
Inth Consent, Fits: Inth Consent · Denied defaults and consent updates through the Google integrations
Enzuzo, Fits: Enzuzo · Consent Mode signals
Hosted cookie scanning and classification
Inth Consent, Not the focus: Inth Consent · Not part of Inth Consent; services are declared in code through integration manifests
Enzuzo, Fits: Enzuzo · Scanning and categorisation
Consent state in server rendering
Inth Consent, Fits: Inth Consent · Available through the c15t framework packages
Enzuzo, Not the focus: Enzuzo · Tested installation is a browser script outside your server render
Published self-serve pricing
Inth Consent, Fits: Inth Consent · Free, Starter and Pro plans with usage pricing on the pricing page
Enzuzo, Fits: Enzuzo · Free and paid plans
Watch the banner arrive.
Both banners were timed on the same CookieBench page on 30 September 2026. Each lane runs until its banner is on screen; the number beside it is the measured time.
- Inth (c15t Next.js)0 msBanner visible · 89 ms
- Enzuzo0 msBanner visible · 285 ms
Page requested · 0 ms
Keep every tag you already run.
Inth Consent runs on c15t, which ships helpers for the analytics, advertising, chat and tag-manager tools you use today. Each one loads only when its consent category is granted, so consent is enforced in your implementation rather than by a script bolted on top.
Your privacy choices
Choose which optional cookies this example site can use.
Tag managersdenied defaults
- Google Tag Manager: denied defaults
Analyticsblocked
- Google Analytics 4: blocked
- Ahrefs: blocked
- Adobe Analytics: blocked
- Amplitude: blocked
- Cloudflare: blocked
- Microsoft Clarity: blocked
- Databuddy: blocked
- Rybbit: blocked
- Fathom: blocked
- Heap: blocked
- Mixpanel: blocked
- Hotjar: blocked
- Hightouch: blocked
- LogRocket: blocked
- Matomo: blocked
- PostHog: blocked
- Promptwatch: blocked
- Pirsch: blocked
- RudderStack: blocked
- Segment: blocked
- Plausible: blocked
- Umami: blocked
- Vercel Analytics: blocked
Functionalblocked
- Crisp: blocked
- Intercom: blocked
- Google Maps: blocked
- YouTube: blocked
Ads & pixelsblocked
- Google Ads: blocked
- Meta Pixel: blocked
- TikTok Pixel: blocked
- LinkedIn Insight Tag: blocked
- Snapchat Pixel: blocked
- Reddit Pixel: blocked
- X Pixel: blocked
- Microsoft UET: blocked
- Clearbit: blocked
Consent belongs in your implementation plan
You wire consent into the app once. After that it ships with your releases.
Install c15t, tell it which category each tag belongs to, and point it at your hosted project. That is the setup. With Enzuzo the same work lives in a dashboard and a script tag, which is fine until a developer needs to know, in code, whether marketing consent was given. Either way, test it: accept, reject, change your mind, and check what actually loads.
How Inth Consent and Enzuzo compare
Two ways to run website consent: application-owned packages, or a hosted script with policy and data-request tools.
| Requirement | Inth Consent | Enzuzo |
|---|---|---|
| Team workflow | Consent UI and behaviour managed alongside your application code, with a hosted dashboard | Managed consent, policy generators and data-request workflows |
| Benchmark snapshot | Score 95; 89 ms in the c15t Next.js example; 0 KB network impact | Score 65; 285 ms; 489 KB network impact |
Compare the total consent cost
Drag the slider to your monthly sessions. Inth Consent picks the cheapest published plan and adds usage at the published rate. Enzuzo publishes its own plans; multi-domain setups need a conversation with them.
Inth Consent
$0/ mo
Cheapest published plan
Free · within included usage
- Free
- $0
- Starter
- $20
- Pro
- $50
Enzuzo
Free tier and paid plans
≈ 33
sessions a day
Pricing you can read before you call
Every plan runs the full Inth Consent infrastructure. Go beyond included usage for $0.001 per request, or request a custom plan.
Starter
Most popularFor small sites moving consent into their application.
$20/ mo
- Everything in Free
- 2 projects
- 25,000 sessions & consent saves /mo
- Production instances included
- Policy packs included
Pro
For growing businesses and agencies managing many sites.
$50/ mo
- Everything in Starter
- Unlimited projects
- 100,000 sessions & consent saves /mo
- Policy packs included
- Chat support
Moving from Enzuzo?
Bring your current setup, renewal date and quote. We’ll map the switch with you. If you want a head start, have your coding agent draft the plan.
Plan it with your coding agent
Plan a migration from Enzuzo to Inth Consent, built on c15t, for this codebase. Find the Enzuzo setup and Consent Mode wiring, map every tag to a c15t integration and consent category, propose how to run c15t on a staging route while Enzuzo stays live, and list what to verify before cutting over. Use https://c15t.com/docs/comparison and https://c15t.com/docs/integrations/overview.