Skip to main content

Inth vs OneTrust

OneTrust runs consent as a hosted script inside a broader privacy platform. Inth Consent runs it inside your application through c15t, with the records hosted for you. Which one fits depends on what your team wants to own.

Ask your coding agent
Audit this codebase for OneTrust consent and estimate a move to Inth Consent, built on c15t. Find the OneTrust script, Consent Mode and tag manager setup, list every analytics, advertising and chat tag, then report what c15t would replace, which consent category each tag needs, and what the page would stop loading before consent. Use https://c15t.com/docs/comparisons/onetrust and https://c15t.com/docs/integrations/overview.
Talk to Inth
Trusted by
  • Expo
  • Zed
  • Infisical
  • Unkey
  • Chelsea Piers
  • Mario Testino
  • Roboto Studio
  • Cal.com
  • Mastra

Which platform fits your team?

Tick the needs that matter to your team and see which platform meets more of them.

What matters to your team?

Inth Consent

Built for teams that own consent in their application.

5of 7 needs· Closer fit

OneTrust

Built for central privacy operations across many channels.

4of 7 needs

  • Consent owned in application code

    Inth Consent, Fits: Inth Consent · c15t runs inside your JavaScript, React or Next.js app, with consent state available to your code

    OneTrust, Not the focus: OneTrust · Hosted script configured in the OneTrust platform

  • Banner on screen in under 100 ms

    Inth Consent, Fits: Inth Consent · 89 ms to a visible banner on the CookieBench c15t Next.js example

    OneTrust, Not the focus: OneTrust · 514 ms on the CookieBench OneTrust example

  • Central CMP administration

    Inth Consent, Not the focus: Inth Consent · Consent dashboard and hosted records; vendor lists and banner copy ship with your releases

    OneTrust, Fits: OneTrust · Cookie inventory, scanning and platform configuration managed centrally

  • Google Consent Mode v2

    Inth Consent, Fits: Inth Consent · Denied defaults and consent updates through the Google integrations

    OneTrust, Fits: OneTrust · Consent Mode and Tag Manager integrations

  • Hosted consent records

    Inth Consent, Fits: Inth Consent · Every saved choice, region and policy version in your Inth dashboard

    OneTrust, Fits: OneTrust · Consent logs and management in the OneTrust platform

  • Published self-serve pricing

    Inth Consent, Fits: Inth Consent · Free, Starter and Pro plans with usage pricing on the pricing page

    OneTrust, Not the focus: OneTrust · Quote based on average daily visitors across channels

  • Wider privacy operations

    Inth Consent, Not the focus: Inth Consent · Website consent layer only; not a data-subject request or governance suite

    OneTrust, Fits: OneTrust · Privacy operations, data-subject requests and governance products in one platform

Watch the banner arrive.

Both banners were timed on the same CookieBench page on 30 September 2026. Each lane runs until its banner is on screen; the number beside it is the measured time.

  1. Inth (c15t Next.js)
    0 ms 
    Banner visible · 89 ms
  2. OneTrust
    0 ms 
    Banner visible · 514 ms

Page requested · 0 ms

 

Keep every tag you already run.

Inth Consent runs on c15t, which ships helpers for the analytics, advertising, chat and tag-manager tools you use today. Each one loads only when its consent category is granted, so consent is enforced in your implementation rather than by a script bolted on top.

Your privacy choices

Choose which optional cookies this example site can use.

Tag managersdenied defaults

  • Google Tag Manager: denied defaults

Analyticsblocked

  • Google Analytics 4: blocked
  • Ahrefs: blocked
  • Adobe Analytics: blocked
  • Amplitude: blocked
  • Cloudflare: blocked
  • Microsoft Clarity: blocked
  • Databuddy: blocked
  • Rybbit: blocked
  • Fathom: blocked
  • Heap: blocked
  • Mixpanel: blocked
  • Hotjar: blocked
  • Hightouch: blocked
  • LogRocket: blocked
  • Matomo: blocked
  • PostHog: blocked
  • Promptwatch: blocked
  • Pirsch: blocked
  • RudderStack: blocked
  • Segment: blocked
  • Plausible: blocked
  • Umami: blocked
  • Vercel Analytics: blocked

Functionalblocked

  • Crisp: blocked
  • Intercom: blocked
  • Google Maps: blocked
  • YouTube: blocked

Ads & pixelsblocked

  • Google Ads: blocked
  • Meta Pixel: blocked
  • TikTok Pixel: blocked
  • LinkedIn Insight Tag: blocked
  • Snapchat Pixel: blocked
  • Reddit Pixel: blocked
  • X Pixel: blocked
  • Microsoft UET: blocked
  • Clearbit: blocked

Consent belongs in your implementation plan

You wire consent into the app once. After that it ships with your releases.

Install c15t, tell it which category each tag belongs to, and point it at your hosted project. That is the setup. With OneTrust the same work lives in a dashboard and a script tag, which is fine until a developer needs to know, in code, whether marketing consent was given. Either way, test it: accept, reject, change your mind, and check what actually loads.

Inth Consent

See consent in your dashboard.

Every saved choice, region and policy version in one place, so you can answer a regulator or a customer without exporting anything.

How Inth Consent and OneTrust compare

Two ways to operate website consent: application-owned packages and a hosted consent platform.

Website consent comparison: Inth Consent and OneTrust
Control before consentScript loader, iframe blocker and network blocker connected to consent categoriesCookie auto-blocking, tag manager integrations and script rewriting
Team workflowConsent UI and behaviour managed alongside your application code, with a hosted dashboardCentral configuration, scanning, cookie inventory and banner templates
Benchmark snapshotScore 95; 89 ms in the c15t Next.js example, 148 ms in the React exampleScore 62; 514 ms in the OneTrust example
Wider requirementsAssess Inth product privacy reviews separately from this consent comparisonAssess OneTrust mobile, CTV, preference and wider governance products separately

Compare the total consent cost

Drag the slider to your monthly sessions. Inth Consent picks the cheapest published plan and adds usage at the published rate. OneTrust prices on average daily visitors and asks you to request a quote.

1,000

Inth Consent

$0/ mo

Cheapest published plan

Free · within included usage

Free
$0
Starter
$20
Pro
$50

OneTrust

Quote-based

≈ 33

average daily visitors to ask about

OneTrust pricing

Pricing

Pricing you can read before you call

Every plan runs the full Inth Consent infrastructure. Go beyond included usage for $0.001 per request, or request a custom plan.

Free

For developers evaluating or shipping internal tools.

$0/ mo
  • 1 project
  • 5,000 sessions & consent saves /mo
  • All paid features on dev instances
  • Production with usage billing
  • Community + docs support

Starter

Most popular

For small sites moving consent into their application.

$20/ mo
  • Everything in Free
  • 2 projects
  • 25,000 sessions & consent saves /mo
  • Production instances included
  • Policy packs included

Pro

For growing businesses and agencies managing many sites.

$50/ mo
  • Everything in Starter
  • Unlimited projects
  • 100,000 sessions & consent saves /mo
  • Policy packs included
  • Chat support

Need enterprise capacity?

Custom usage, advanced SDKs, APIs, integrations, implementation guidance and priority support with a dedicated Slack channel.

Contact sales

Moving from OneTrust?

Bring your current setup, renewal date and quote. We’ll map the switch with you. If you want a head start, have your coding agent draft the plan.

Plan it with your coding agent
Plan a migration from OneTrust to Inth Consent, built on c15t, for this codebase. Find the OneTrust script and Consent Mode setup, map every tag to a c15t integration and consent category, propose how to run c15t on a staging route while OneTrust stays live, and list what to verify before cutting over. Use https://c15t.com/docs/comparisons/onetrust and https://c15t.com/docs/integrations/overview.
Talk to Inth

Inth vs OneTrust: common questions

Scope, consent architecture and evaluation.

Both approaches support consent-aware Google integrations. Review category mappings, denied defaults and updates, then verify actual tag behaviour after each visitor choice.