Skip to content
Opens the cited record in a new tab

Privacy enforcement issues: the mistakes behind the fines and lawsuits

Regulators and plaintiffs rarely object to tracking in the abstract. They point to something specific: a tag that fired before the banner, an opt-out that stopped nothing, a pixel that sent a health search to an ad platform. These 15 pages group the library's cases by that failure, with the checks to run on your own systems.

Source review
26 October 2026

How the issue pages work

Every case in the library is tagged with one or more of 15 issues: the specific thing that went wrong in the site, app or data flow. Each issue page explains the failure, sets out what regulators and courts found, lists the tagged cases newest first and ends with checks you can run on your own systems.

The issues are Inth's labels, not legal categories. One case often carries several, and the same failure can be argued under different laws. For the statutes themselves, see the law pages.

Opt-outs

When a visitor says no and the systems behind the site keep going.

What tags and vendors receive

What a pixel, replay script or chat widget actually sends, and to whom.

Sharing, transfers and breaches

Where the data went after collection, and what had to be disclosed.

Sources and limits

The sources for each case are on its case page, and each issue page lists the cases it draws on. Read how to use the library.

Source review: 26 October 2026. This page indexes the issue pages in the Enforcement library. Inth assigns the issue labels and writes the checks. An allegation is not a finding, and a settlement does not establish liability. It is not legal advice.

Questions about the issue pages

Short answers drawn from the pages above.