Skip to main contentSmith v. Rack Room Shoes
The court allowed Wiretap Act and computer-access claims to proceed on allegations of tracking without permission. It dismissed the UCL and CLRA claims without leave to amend.
Case record
- US District Court, Northern District of California
- Federal Wiretap Act and CDAFA
- 3:24-cv-06709-RFL
- Motion to dismiss granted in part and denied in part
- 4 August 2025
- 16 October 2026
What this record establishes
This page describes the cited opinion or order. A dismissal, pleading decision, standing ruling or jurisdiction decision has a different scope from a merits judgment. Later proceedings and appeals may change the position. Unpublished and nonprecedential decisions are identified in the status where applicable.
Checks for your own systems
Inth’s technical interpretation: use this case to choose what evidence to collect in your own implementation. These checks are not instructions issued by the court or regulator.
- Record the first request or capture alongside the time a user makes a choice.
- Check client scripts, tag-manager rules and server events for collection before the consent decision.
- Repeat after refusal, withdrawal, navigation and a fresh session.
- Inventory browser destinations, server relays, exports and partner integrations.
- Trace which fields leave the service, when, and for which stated purpose.
Sources and limits
Source review: 16 October 2026. This record covers the cited source and procedural stage. It does not audit the organisation’s present implementation or establish every later legal development.