Skip to main contentBriskin v. Shopify
The en banc court held that California could exercise specific jurisdiction over the alleged collection of a known California user’s data. The decision addresses jurisdiction, rather than deciding the underlying privacy claims.
Case record
- US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit (en banc)
- Personal jurisdiction in privacy litigation
- 22-15815
- Jurisdictional dismissal reversed and remanded
- 21 April 2025
- 16 October 2026
What this record establishes
This page describes the cited opinion or order. A dismissal, pleading decision, standing ruling or jurisdiction decision has a different scope from a merits judgment. Later proceedings and appeals may change the position. Unpublished and nonprecedential decisions are identified in the status where applicable.
Checks for your own systems
Inth’s technical interpretation: use this case to choose what evidence to collect in your own implementation. These checks are not instructions issued by the court or regulator.
- Record the IP addresses, device attributes and identifiers actually transmitted to each destination.
- Distinguish routing metadata, fingerprinting inputs and message contents in the evidence.
- Repeat captures before a choice, after refusal and after navigation.
Sources and limits
Source review: 16 October 2026. This record covers the cited source and procedural stage. It does not audit the organisation’s present implementation or establish every later legal development.