Skip to main contentLicea v. Globecast America
The tentative ruling distinguishes the CIPA pleading from computer-access and privacy claims. It would sustain the CIPA demurrer with leave to amend while allowing other claims to proceed.
Case record
- Los Angeles Superior Court
- CIPA and CDAFA
- 23STCV16165
- Tentative: CIPA pleading rejected with leave to amend; other privacy claims survive
- 7 February 2024
- 16 October 2026
What this record establishes
The source is a court’s tentative text mirrored by rulings.law. This record does not establish whether the court adopted or changed it at the hearing, and does not establish the current docket status. A tentative pleading decision evaluates allegations; it is not a finding that tracking occurred or that a party broke the law. This trial-court text is not binding appellate precedent.
Checks for your own systems
Inth’s technical interpretation: use this case to choose what evidence to collect in your own implementation. These checks are not instructions issued by the court or regulator.
- Map every session-replay and chat vendor, including embedded frames and server relays.
- Compare what the site receives with what each vendor can receive, read, retain and use independently.
- Record the consent state and the timing of each captured message or field.
Sources and limits
Source review: 16 October 2026. This record covers the cited source and procedural stage. It does not audit the organisation’s present implementation or establish every later legal development.