Skip to main contentFrasco v. Flo Health: claim against Meta
The private action concerns alleged sharing of reproductive-health data through the Flo app. Plaintiffs’ counsel reports a jury verdict against Meta. The separate settlements with Flo, Google and Flurry are recorded separately.
Case record
- US District Court, Northern District of California
- CIPA §632
- Jury verdict reported by plaintiffs’ counsel; damages judgment not established
- 1 August 2025
- 16 October 2026
What this record establishes
The linked source is plaintiffs’ counsel’s account and accompanying case materials. A reported verdict does not establish the amount of an entered damages judgment. This record imports no requested damages figure as an award.
Checks for your own systems
Inth’s technical interpretation: use this case to choose what evidence to collect in your own implementation. These checks are not instructions issued by the court or regulator.
- Inspect URLs, referrers, search terms, form values and account identifiers in outgoing payloads.
- Check health, financial and authenticated surfaces separately from public pages.
- Compare browser traffic with server relays, vendor logs and the purposes described to users.
Sources and limits
Source review: 16 October 2026. This record covers the cited source and procedural stage. It does not audit the organisation’s present implementation or establish every later legal development.